Category: Uncategorized

Entangledenergy.net, entanglednucleons.net, and entangledstardust.net have all been reviewed and edited as of 7-17-21. Next step is proof-reading, but the material on these sites should be up-to-date. Thank you for your patience.

Please note: To date, May 13, 2021, the website ‘entangledenergy.net’ has been reviewed and updated from the beginning through ‘Entangled Chemistry.’ This website and its two companion websites ‘entanglednucleons.net’ and ‘entangledstardust.net’ will continue to be reviewed and updated over the next few months. Thank you for your patience!

Let’s only consider elementary energy systems here …. as opposed to composite energy systems, such as protons and other larger particles.

Elementary energy systems consist of 1-D, 2-D, or possibly 3-D electromagnetic interactions.  Photons consist of 1-D electromagnetic interactions and electrons consist of 2-D electromagnetic interactions.  Protons may possess a component that consists of 3-D electromagnetic interactions, but that will be discussed at a later time.

Photons consist of 1-D unidirectional energy that has been created by nonrandom energy of 1-D space.  This unidirectional energy composes the 1-D electric component of the photon.  It moves outward from origin or system center toward a lower energy level (i.e., lower energy density) by transferring some of its energy to the inherent energy of space, thereby displacing it.  The energy of space reacts by forming a 1-D magnetic energy component at 90 degrees with its newly acquired energy to provide directional balance to the 1-D electric component.  At the same time, a 1-D time energy component forms at 180 degrees to its “sister” 1-D magnetic component to provide it directional balance and to maintain the directional balance of the inherent energy of space.  However, the 1-D time energy immediately dissipates back into the random energy of space as it forms.  This provides directional balance to the formation of the 1-D magnetic energy while allowing it to provide maximum directional balance to the 1-D electric energy.

1-D electromagnetic (e-m) energy does not possess a gravitational energy gradient since it takes 2-D or 3-D space to form such a gradient.  A gravitational energy gradient is formed by the inherent energy of space by increasing the ratio of potential energy to kinetic energy of space inward toward a body of mass (or more accurately, a body of mass-energy).  This is not possible in 1-D space.  As a result, 1-D electromagnetic energy possesses no gravitational energy gradient, and instead possesses unidirectional motion at v = c along a path that is analogous to the center of gravity for 2-D and 3-D elementary energy systems.  And 1-D electromagnetic energy systems do not possess “antimatter.”  That is not to say they cannot possess “mirror images” of themselves, but since they possess no gravitational energy gradient, they do not possess confined energy or mass.

On the other hand, electrons consist of 2-D electromagnetic energy, and the inherent energy of space forms a 2-D gravitational energy gradient about the electron to provide directional balance to its total energy outward from system center.  However, since the 2-D electromagnetic energy of the electron cycles through high and low energy levels, the strength of its 2-D gravitational energy gradient does the same, fluctuating in strength with each e-m oscillation.  The changing strength of the gravitational energy gradient produces the charge field surrounding the electron.

Electric energy displacement of 2-D space requires more energy than displacement of 1-D space.  As a result, the 2-D electric component of the electron is the dominant energy in its structure as opposed to the 1-D energy along its axis of spin.  In the electron structure, its 2-D electric energy moves outward from system center toward a lower energy level (i.e., lower energy density), and then returns back to system center along the 1-D axis of spin.  Since the 2-D electric energy is the dominant energy in the system, this creates a stable structure existing at lowest possible energy level.

For the electron’s antimatter counterpart, the positron, its 2-D electric energy moves inward toward system center, going from lower energy level (i.e., lower energy density) to higher energy level (i.e., higher energy density) – analogous to a river flowing uphill.  This represents a 2-D e-m energy system at a high energy level, which is not naturally sustainable since energy wants to move from a high energy level toward a lower energy level.

Entangled electron/positron particles (i.e., e-+/e+- and e+-/e-+ particles) provide optimal directional balance for each other.  Both entangled partners alternate e-m directionality (i.e., oscillating from a positron to an electron or vice versa with every e-m interaction) and interchange identities with each e-m interaction.  This maintains a stable structure for the entangled particles.  However, when the particles become disentangled, the positron structure will now exist at a high energy level since its 2-D electric energy moves from low energy to high energy level (i.e., energy density), it is likely to convert to an electron structure at its earliest opportunity.  This may help explain why there is more “visible” matter in our universe than antimatter.

 

 

 

In this model, space itself is composed of basic 1-D bidirectional units of energy in constant random motion and distribution relative to each other.  The 1-D bidirectional units of energy may each move outward toward lower energy density or inward toward higher energy density to maintain the inherent energy density of space.  The randomness of motion and distribution of the basic 1-D units of energy also maintain the inherent energy density and directional balance of space.

But, there may be another component of 1-D bidirectional units of space that contributes to the directional balance of the inherent energy of space.  When each of the 1-D bidirectional units of energy move outward from or inward to its center, its total energy remains the same.  In other words, all 1-D bidirectional units of energy of space each possess the same amount of total energy.  They can only vary their 1-D energy density to accommodate their local environment.

However, each 1-D bidirectional unit of energy probably spins in opposing directions along its length whenever it moves outward from center or inward to system center.  When the 1-D energy moves relative to its system center in opposing directions, it needs to maintain optimal directional balance, and may do so by each side spinning along its length in opposing directions.  This sets up the same poles at each end with an opposing pole existing at system center.

This spin is significant with elementary particles as well.  Opposing energies may require spin to provide optimal directional balance.  For example, 1-D photons consist of three energies:  1-D electric, 1-D magnetic, and 1-D time.  When a 1-D electric energy moves outward toward a lower energy level by transferring some of its energy to the inherent energy of space, the energy of space reacts by forming a 1-D magnetic component to directionally balance the 1-D electric energy.  As the 1-D magnetic energy forms, a 1-D time energy forms at 180 degrees to its “sister” magnetic energy to provide directional balance to the 1-D magnetic energy, and thereby maintain the directional balance of the inherent energy of space.  As the 1-D time energy forms, it immediately dissipates back into the random energy of space.  This allows its “sister” magnetic energy to provide maximum directional balance to the 1-D electric energy.

The 1-D magnetic energy and the 1-D time energy are provided by the inherent of space, and are most likely produced from a single basic 1-D bidirectional unit of 1-D space, with 1/2 of the basic 1-D unit of energy forming the 1-D magnetic energy and the opposing 1/2 of the basic 1-D unit of energy forming the 1-D time energy.  The maximum amount of 1-D magnetic energy per electromagnetic interaction, then, would be equal to one-half of a basic 1-D bidirectional unit of energy of space.

 

What causes the curvature of space?  In this model of elementary energy, as in so many others, energy is composed of binary systems, such as matter and anti-matter, protons and electrons, and yin and yang.

So what is space composed of?  Let’s start with space being composed of binary energy systems.  The most fundamental types of energy are kinetic energy and potential energy.  The most fundamental dimension, at least from our perspective, is 1-dimension (1-D).  So let’s begin with space consisting of basic units of 1-D energy.  To give each basic unit of 1-D energy some flexibility, let’s allow it to move inward and outward from center while maintaining its total energy.  So when it moves inward, its energy density increases, and when it moves outward, its energy density decreases.  Each bidirectional 1-D unit of energy is composed of confined energy, or energy that has imposed boundaries, in this case, its total energy.  The potential energy of space, then, is the energy confined within each basic 1-D unit of energy of space.  It is essentially “stored” energy.

The inherent energy of space will move toward entropy or greater randomness or optimal directional balance.  In other words, it wants to exist at its laziest possible energy level.  So the basic 1-D units of energy of space are in constant random motion and distribution relative to each other in a dynamic equilibrium.  This motion constitutes the kinetic energy of space.

When this random energy of space becomes locally non-random, the non-random energy forms unidirectional, or electric energy, and the energy of space reacts by forming magnetic energy and time energy to provide directional balance to the electric energy.  So, the result is electromagnetic energy.  When electromagnetic energy forms 2-D and 3-D electromagnetic energy systems, this results in confined energy systems in which 2-D or 3-D unidirectional energy moves inward or outward from its system center during electromagnetic interactions.  The energy of surrounding space reacts by forming a gravitational energy gradient inward toward the 2-D or 3-D electromagnetic energy system center.  The gravitational energy gradient is formed by an increasing ratio of potential energy of space to kinetic energy of space inward toward system center.  So the closer to system center, the greater the proportion of potential energy of space compared to that of kinetic energy of space.  This means that the fabric of space changes inward toward the center of gravity, with more and more basic 1-D units of energy of space and slower and slower rate of motion of the 1-D units of energy of space relative to each other inward toward system center.  This causes the curvature of space near a 2-D or 3-D electromagnetic energy system center.

The same is true for large bodies of electrically neutral mass, such as planets and stars.  For purposes of illustration, let’s assume that the body of mass possesses roughly the same energy density throughout.  This means that at each radius level (or “spherical shell”) outward from system center will consist of more and more total energy.  This creates an energy gradient, and that, along with the difference between the energy density of the body mass compared to that of the inherent energy of space, contributes to static unidirectional energy or an energy gradient.  The energy of surrounding space reacts to provide directional balance to the energy gradient of the body of mass.  Again, the energy of surrounding space forms a gravitational energy gradient by forming an increasing ratio of potential energy to kinetic energy of space inward toward the center of gravity.  And again, this changing ratio of potential energy of space to kinetic energy of space changes the fabric of space, resulting in a curvature of space near a body of mass.