Let’s only consider elementary energy systems here …. as opposed to composite energy systems, such as protons and other larger particles.
Elementary energy systems consist of 1-D, 2-D, or possibly 3-D electromagnetic interactions. Photons consist of 1-D electromagnetic interactions and electrons consist of 2-D electromagnetic interactions. Protons may possess a component that consists of 3-D electromagnetic interactions, but that will be discussed at a later time.
Photons consist of 1-D unidirectional energy that has been created by nonrandom energy of 1-D space. This unidirectional energy composes the 1-D electric component of the photon. It moves outward from origin or system center toward a lower energy level (i.e., lower energy density) by transferring some of its energy to the inherent energy of space, thereby displacing it. The energy of space reacts by forming a 1-D magnetic energy component at 90 degrees with its newly acquired energy to provide directional balance to the 1-D electric component. At the same time, a 1-D time energy component forms at 180 degrees to its “sister” 1-D magnetic component to provide it directional balance and to maintain the directional balance of the inherent energy of space. However, the 1-D time energy immediately dissipates back into the random energy of space as it forms. This provides directional balance to the formation of the 1-D magnetic energy while allowing it to provide maximum directional balance to the 1-D electric energy.
1-D electromagnetic (e-m) energy does not possess a gravitational energy gradient since it takes 2-D or 3-D space to form such a gradient. A gravitational energy gradient is formed by the inherent energy of space by increasing the ratio of potential energy to kinetic energy of space inward toward a body of mass (or more accurately, a body of mass-energy). This is not possible in 1-D space. As a result, 1-D electromagnetic energy possesses no gravitational energy gradient, and instead possesses unidirectional motion at v = c along a path that is analogous to the center of gravity for 2-D and 3-D elementary energy systems. And 1-D electromagnetic energy systems do not possess “antimatter.” That is not to say they cannot possess “mirror images” of themselves, but since they possess no gravitational energy gradient, they do not possess confined energy or mass.
On the other hand, electrons consist of 2-D electromagnetic energy, and the inherent energy of space forms a 2-D gravitational energy gradient about the electron to provide directional balance to its total energy outward from system center. However, since the 2-D electromagnetic energy of the electron cycles through high and low energy levels, the strength of its 2-D gravitational energy gradient does the same, fluctuating in strength with each e-m oscillation. The changing strength of the gravitational energy gradient produces the charge field surrounding the electron.
Electric energy displacement of 2-D space requires more energy than displacement of 1-D space. As a result, the 2-D electric component of the electron is the dominant energy in its structure as opposed to the 1-D energy along its axis of spin. In the electron structure, its 2-D electric energy moves outward from system center toward a lower energy level (i.e., lower energy density), and then returns back to system center along the 1-D axis of spin. Since the 2-D electric energy is the dominant energy in the system, this creates a stable structure existing at lowest possible energy level.
For the electron’s antimatter counterpart, the positron, its 2-D electric energy moves inward toward system center, going from lower energy level (i.e., lower energy density) to higher energy level (i.e., higher energy density) – analogous to a river flowing uphill. This represents a 2-D e-m energy system at a high energy level, which is not naturally sustainable since energy wants to move from a high energy level toward a lower energy level.
Entangled electron/positron particles (i.e., e-+/e+- and e+-/e-+ particles) provide optimal directional balance for each other. Both entangled partners alternate e-m directionality (i.e., oscillating from a positron to an electron or vice versa with every e-m interaction) and interchange identities with each e-m interaction. This maintains a stable structure for the entangled particles. However, when the particles become disentangled, the positron structure will now exist at a high energy level since its 2-D electric energy moves from low energy to high energy level (i.e., energy density), it is likely to convert to an electron structure at its earliest opportunity. This may help explain why there is more “visible” matter in our universe than antimatter.