Category: Directional Balance

What happens in entanglement?  In this model, particles are entangled through alternating electromagnetic (e-m) interactions.  If the entangled particles are identical (and opposing), then they also possess interchanging identities with every e-m interaction.  That is, neither can be distinguished from the other.

When measured, however, an entangled particle will be “frozen” at the identity it has at the instant of measurement.  So if it is an electron (i.e., negative e-m directionality) at the instant of measurement, the measurement will record the particle’s identity as an electron.  If it is a positron (i.e., positive e-m directionality) at the instant of measurement, that is the identity or unidirectional properties that will be observed.

Without measurement, each identical and opposing entangled partner will possess alternating e-m directionality with each e-m interaction, so that it will go from being a positron to an electron, back to a positron, and so on.  It’s entangled partner will at the same time go from being an electron to a positron, back to an electron, and so on (see Entanglement).  The two identical entangled partners will also interchange identities, so that they cannot be distinguished from each other.  Together, they compose a single energy entity.  Imagine the two entangled particles as each being an opposing pole of a single energy system.

What is directional balance?  The inherent energy of space is composed of basic 1-D units of energy in perfect random motion and distribution relative to each other, in a state of dynamic equilibrium with optimal directional balance.  Until, the perfect randomness becomes nonrandom, it will remain directionally balanced, or at its lowest energy level.  Once a portion of it random energy becomes nonrandom, then the nonrandom energy composes unidirectional energy.  And the unidirectional energy is not directionally balanced, and as a result, exists at a higher energy level.

Unidirectional energy, however, can form structures that are directionally balanced, such as entangled particles.  In other words, unidirectional energy can provide some degree of directional balance to other unidirectional energy.

Each of the entangled particles possesses electromagnetic energy with energy in motion relative to system center.  The surrounding energy of space reacts by forming a gravitational energy gradient about each of the entangled particles.  Yet, the gravitational energy gradients change direction with each e-m interaction of the entangled particles, so that even the gravitational energy gradients do not interfere with the total system directional balance …. as long as the partners remain entangled.

Now, let’s picture the two entangled particles existing a light-year apart. As identical entangled partners, they compose a single energy entity with optimal directional balance.

When one of the entangled particles interacts with another energy system, it may become disentangled from its original partner.  Let’s say that the entangled partner was in the positron phase when it interacted with another energy system.  Instantly, we know that its entangled partner, a light-year away was in the electron phase when it became disentangled from its partner.  Is the disentanglement of the particle in the positron phase communicating to its entangled partner to be in the phase with the opposing e-m directionality?  Not in this case.  The particles are entangled because they possess opposing alternating e-m directionality with every e-m interaction.

However, when the particle in the positron phase interacts with a “external” particle, then it may no longer possess alternating e-m directionality with every e-m interaction.  So what happens to its formerly entangled partner now in the electron phase?  Since its entangled partner no longer has alternating e-m directionality with every e-m interaction, then why should it?  It has now become disentangled and the single energy entity the two entangled particles formed no longer exists.  But how can the entangled particle in the electron phase instantly know that its partner is no longer undergoing alternating e-m directionality with every e-m interaction?

This may not be the right answer, but it seems to be the most obvious answer:  When the entangled partner in the positron phase interacts with an external energy and becomes disentangled from its original partner, now in the electron phase, that partner instantly loses directional balance.  It instantly becomes unidirectional energy, and continues to exist in the electron phase as it goes through e-m interactions.  It no longer alternates e-m directionality with every e-m interaction.

So, does this mean the overall directional balance of the universe has now been affected?  Most likely not.  The overall directional balance of the universe, including the energy of space, and all unidirectional energy systems, most of which are entangled with other unidirectional energy, will equal zero.  That is, if one (-) particle forms, then an equal (+) particle must form to maintain the overall directional balance of the universe.

So when the formerly entangled particle, now in the electron phase, becomes disentangled from its partner, somewhere in the universe, there is another disentangled particle.  There is a twist to this, however.  The twist is that, when a particle in the positron phase becomes disentangled, if it does not instantly interact with another energy system, then it will convert to an electron on the next e-m interaction, and remain an electron until it interacts with another particle.  This is because the positron structure represents a higher energy level than that of its “sister” electron, and so it will spontaneously convert to the lower energy electron structure (see Positron – higher energy level).

But when the electron is captured by, or becomes part of an atomic energy system, it will once again take on alternating e-m directionality, becoming entangled with a nucleon partner, and if its orbital is full, with an orbital partner, both with opposing e-m directionality.  So the electron, once again oscillates between the electron structure and the positron structure with every e-m interaction (see Entangled nucleons).

 

The inherent energy of space wants to exist at its lowest possible energy level – in a state of dynamic equilibrium in which the basic 1-D energy units of space are in constant random motion and distribution relative to each other.

When non-random energy, such as electric energy, or bodies of mass, displace the energy of space, intruding on its directional balance, the surrounding energy of space reacts by forming magnetic energy, time energy, and gravitational energy gradients to maintain its directional balance.

Below are two fundamental categories of energy systems:

1)  Energy in motion relative to system center, and

2)  Energy not in motion relative to system center.

Size makes a difference, as does motion, with respect to how the energy system displaces and intrudes on the directional balance of surrounding space.  The inherent energy of space must react to unidirectional, or non-random, energy to maintain its directional balance and lowest possible energy level.

The size and motion of energy relative to its system center also has a major impact on the Schwarzchild radius, but that will be addressed in a future blog.  Larger bodies of mass with no or little energy motion relative to system center possess the Schwarzchild radius as we know it.  Much smaller elementary energy systems that consist of electromagnetic interactions with energy (i.e., electric, magnetic) in motion relative to system center most likely possess a Schwarzchild radius that is significantly different than that for large bodies of mass.

For now, let’s focus on the type of directional balance required for each of the above categories of energy systems.

1-D photons are composed of energy in motion relative to system center (i.e., the path of v = c).  So are 2-D electrons and 2-D positrons.  3-D atomic energy systems are a little more complicated due to the multiple interactions between and among their constituent particles, so won’t be addressed here.

In the case of 1-D photons, the 1-D electric energy moves outward from system center toward a lower energy level (less density) by transferring some of its energy to the 1-D energy of adjacent space, which forms a 1-D magnetic energy at right angles to provide maximum directional balance to the 1-D electric energy.  At the same time, the energy of space forms a 1-D time energy at 180 degrees to its “sister” 1-D magnetic energy to provide directional balance while allowing the 1-D magnetic energy to provide maximum directional balance to the 1-D electric energy.  The 1-D time energy immediately dissipates back into the random energy of space as it forms.  When the 1-D magnetic energy reaches its highest energy level – that of the inherent energy of 1-D space – then it can proceed no further, and starts returning its newly acquired energy back to the 1-D electric energy, forcing it to return to its original high energy level.  The process then repeats itself (see Electromagnetic energy).

In the case of 2-D electrons, the 2-D electric energy moves outward from system center in a 2-D plane toward a lower energy level (less density) by transferring some of its energy to the 2-D energy of adjacent space which forms a perpendicular 2-D magnetic energy to provide maximum directional balance to the 2-D electric energy.  At the same time, the energy of space forms a 2-D time energy at 180 degrees to its “sister” 2-D magnetic energy to provide directional balance while allowing the 2-D magnetic energy to provide maximum directional balance to the 2-D electric energy.  The 2-D time energy dissipates back into the random energy of space as it forms (see Electron structure).  In the case of 2-D energy, the 2-D energy of space also forms a gravitational energy gradient to provide directional balance to the 2-D energy system.  Since the 2-D electron structure oscillates from 2-D electric energy at high energy level back to 2-D energy at low energy level, and then repeating the process, this causes the strength of the 2-D gravitational energy gradient to oscillate with it.  The oscillation of strength of the 2-D gravitational energy gradient with every e-m interaction of the 2-D electron results in a changing energy field that composes the “charge field” about the electron.

Large bodies of mass, such as planets, are composed, for the most part, of electrically neutral energy.  For purposes of illustration, let’s assume that large bodies of mass consist of approximately the same energy density throughout.  This means that there is more and more total energy per radius level outward from system center.  This creates an energy gradient outward from system center with the least amount of total energy at system center and the greatest amount of total energy at system surface per radius level.  The 3-D energy of space reacts to provide directional balance to this energy gradient of the body of mass, and most likely, also for the energy density differential between the body of mass and that of surrounding space.  In the case of a large body of mass, its energy does not move relative to system center, and therefore the strength of its 3-D gravitational energy gradient remains constant (see Gravitational energy gradient).  As a result, the gravitational energy gradient of a large body of mass is static and does not compose a “charge field” as in the case of 2-D elementary energy particles.

 

 

 

Why should randomness be the ultimate goal of existence?  Why couldn’t perfect order be that ideal state of existence?  If “nothingness” represents perfect order, then it possesses lowest possible entropy, and lack of any randomness.  Why couldn’t “nothing” be satisfied with this arrangement?

One thing “nothingness” eliminates, along with everything else, is probability.  In the case of “nothingness” with perfect non-randomness, it represents the lowest possible probability.  There is one possibility.  There are no other options.  There is only a state of perfect order.  “Nothing” is nothing.  It can never be something else.  And this represents the highest possible energy level.

However, all existence moves toward maximum entropy, or disorder.  It moves toward perfect randomness, maximum probability, and maximum possibilities.  The purest probability represents entropy, and maximum possibilities.  This includes “nothingness.”  You may argue that “nothing” is nothing, it doesn’t exist.  And you might be right.  But could “nothing” move toward a lower energy level or lazier existence by producing more and more randomness, moving toward entropy?  It could do this by forming opposing identical pairs of “somethingness” so that if these pairs were combined, they would once again form “nothingness.”  This may be the earliest ancestor of entanglement.

But, we can discuss this production of pairs of “somethingness” (e.g., electron and positron, etc.) in a future blog.  For now, let’s focus on randomness, probability, and possibilities.

Consider the double-slit experiment.  Photons or electrons are “shot” at the double-slits and exist in any number of possible positions.  The “particles” apparently exist as wavelike structures that pass through both slits at the same time, showing up as interference patterns on the screen behind the double slits.  The interference pattern looks just like the pattern that would be created by waves of water flowing through the double slits and hitting the screen.  The strongest interference pattern exists at the center of the interference distribution and the patterns get weaker outward from center, analogous to a “normal distribution.”  The particle can exist in any position along this normal distribution, but has the highest probability of existing near the center of the normal curve and less and less probability of existing outward from the center.  So the particles shot through the double slits possess a degree of probability in terms of position.  For each particle, it’s position has a lot of possibilities governed by probability.

When a device measures which slit the particle passed through, then an odd thing happens.  The pattern on the screen consists of two dominant lines only, as if solid objects passed through the two slits.  There is no evidence of wavelike behavior.  There is only evidence of solid objects passing through one or the other slit.  In this case, the position of the particle has only two possibilities:  the particle passes through the left slit or it passes through the right slit.  In this case, there is less randomness, less entropy, and few possibilities compared to the unmeasured particles that, for some reason, pass through the slits as a wavelike structure.

In terms of particle position, the wavelike structure passing through both slits at the same time has greater randomness, greater entropy, and more possibilities than when the position of the particle is measured with a detector.  When the position of the particle is measured, there is only one possibility.  It has passed through one of the two slits.  When its position is measured, all the possibilities of its position have collapsed into one possible position – the position at which it was observed.  In the case of measured position, there is less randomness, less entropy, and only one possibility.

So the wavelike structure exists at the lower energy level while the particle, once observed, exists at a higher energy level.  So, at least in this case, the wavelike structure is the preferred existence, since it has greater randomness, greater entropy, and more possibilities.  It exists at a lower energy level.